a (late) visit from world cup
a visit from world cup
i have an urge to make these introductory remarks simply a list of reasons why (unamerican)football is the best sport in the world. i think that hypothetical list would look something like this (but while this list is numbered it is not numbered in order of importance):
1. unlike the major sports in the us, the world cup winner can realistically claim to be world champions.
2. while most ignoramouses complain about (unamerican)football is boring, it's actually the least boring sport to watch because:
2a. there are no commercials
2b. there are no timeouts
2c. there are no significant stoppages of play
2d. the action is non-stop
i'm sort of over this list idea. i think i would rather compare and contrast (unamerican)football with the major us sports--baseball, basketball and (american)football-- in terms of boredom.
baseball, to the casual fan, is nearly unbearable to watch. the pitcher nods off seven different pitches from his catcher, goes into his eighteen second pre-pitch stretch, holds it and finally throws home. at this point it's either a ball or a foul ball. then the enitre routine is repeated except the pitcher adjusts his hat for twominutes before even looking towards the catcher. plus it's like ten minutes in between every half-inning and don't even get me started on mid-inning pitcher changes. what are bullpens for if the relief pitcher is going to throw twenty warmup pitches once he's in the game? don't forget conferences at the mount, base-runners changing their batting gloves, pickoff attempts, batters calling timeouts and throwing around the horn. with all this time-wasting it's a wonder baseball games ever finish . . . under four hours.
basketball: if bill walton is one of the announcers, just turn off your tv. if not, it's still probably a good idea to turn off your tv or get some coffee because i don't know how you're going to stay awake during this snooze-fest. basketball is the only sport that i'm aware of where "tv timeouts" are inserted to borify any action. past that it's all twenty second timeouts (which are more like a minute), fouls, defensive three seconds and half-times with the worst kinds of player profiles imaginable. but even the game itself is boring: walking the ball up the court, throwing into the post, waiting for the double-team, kicking it out to someone who misses a jumper, rebound and repeat. (there are two exceptions to boring basketball--the suns [specifically steve nash] and allen iverson.)
(american)football: i saw a commercial the other day for some sort of nfl tv package where you could watch 8 games at once. they also offered a feature where you can watch an already finished game with all the inaction taken out--no commercials, no timeouts and not even huddles. you can watch an entire (american)football game--every single play--in about a half-hour. if every game last over three hours but there is only a half-hour of action, wtf am i watching for over two-and-a-half- hours? answer: commercials (and never good ones, except that one with peyton manning), replays of every play (sometimes multiple replays), official replays (as in when teams challenge a call using instant replay), huddles, substitutions, tv analysts with their in-depth reporting on the sidelines (i use in-depth and reporting loosely) and shots of bored fans.
the consensus: anybody who complains about(unamerican)football being boring is (1) a liar, (2) unaware of (unamerican)football and simply repeating what they hear on sports radio or (3) evil. the real reason there is such an effort to discredit (unamerican) football is because it's so hard to advertise during matches.